For the opening poem to the series that was to become A Shropshire Lad, AE Housman penned a thirty-two line, eight stanza, poem about the Golden Jubilee of the reign of Queen Victoria. His main object for concern was God himself and the role he had ‘actually’ played in ‘saving’ the Queen through duration of her reign up until this date. As the poem rolls, from the extensive setting of an encapsulating illumination of England and into the countless deaths involved in the Empires preservation, this question is emphasized, attacked, and emphasized again until we realise that, not only did God have very little to do with this apparent ‘saving’, he had also quite blatantly disregarded everyone else in the process receiving this unfair praise. He begins by giving God a percentage credit, which, we are to find out, he does not deserve.
Lad’s we’ll remember friends of ours
Who shared the work with God.
We are reminded that ‘God Save the Queen’ is sang by living people, as obvious as this may seem, which in and of itself reminds us that all who have lost their lives in this constant protection have not been saved and are no longer around to attach themselves to the festival of monarchical survival that they died for.
The saviours come not home tonight
Themselves they could not save.
The speaker never once suggests that they expected God to save them: just that they could not save themselves whilst aiding God to save another mortal human-being (just the one.)
‘The land they perished for’ is now the geographic location of the festivity headquarters. Away from the fatherland (yes, the empirical choice of a Nazi type noun is deliberate here) Asia and its wonderful Nile River are paired with Housman’s semi-fictional Shropshire and England’s beloved Severn for the purposes of nothing more (or less) than death and the markers of tombs and the reading of names to bedfellow the encapsulating beacons of celebration.
Now some people say that Housman was a cynic, a pejorist who criticised from a distance and participated in nought. I, personally, think it is fine that people believe such because in doing so they kind of prove his point for him. He was, instead, a humanitarian who wrote of the plight of the world and its youth. His close affinity with the struggles of young soldiers was always a metaphor for the struggles of his life, his loneliness and the isolation that never really became Stoppard’s ‘Invention of Love.’ He wanted to identify with the military and the ridiculousness of their situation but never dared get too close, more of a mark of respect for them and against the little notice they brought upon others. He never was a military man. He was a pejorist, sometimes a cynic, yes. Did he believe the world was going mad? I think he probably did and poems such as this are a better thesis than most people have ever produced to the contrary. It seems that what made him sad, not mad, is that God had absolutely nothing to do with saving the Queen. If the song is, instead, a suggestion to God, then he had clearly paid it no heed and simply gotten on with taking all the credit. Housman believed that the salt of the British earth was its youth and it was in fear for them that his cynicism (or realism) grew. He leaves us with praise for his fellow man, thinly veiling a stark warning for the changing of attitudes around him and the social downfall this could possibly create,
Oh, God will save her, fear you not:
Be you the men you’ve been,
Get you the sons your father got,
And God will save the Queen.
In other words, why don’t we leave God to it, look after ourselves and, more importantly, each other: everyone is, in theory, just as important as the Queen but in Housman’s reality, clearly not. God is very selective and usurping of credit sometimes. I write this on June 2nd 2012 a few days ahead of our Queen’s 60th jubilee celebrations and I wonder why people still think that Housman was a cynic and a false pejorist. It seems to me that ‘prophet’ may be a better label to pin on him. His poem is timeless which, in itself, is laughable as he was deemed and doomed as out-dated in his own time. In this glorious day and age men seem to die for governments as opposed to Monarchs, as was actually the case in Victorian times also but the result seems the same. People say we no longer are empire builders, and maybe we are not, but there are men and women dying all over the place for our government and the governments of our friends. Housman was not necessarily political and neither is this. It is about humanity and the worth of human life. In a few days’ time it will be sixty years since God has saved our Queen and I wonder if things are really all that different now than they were then. There is no way that my dreamer’s mind will allow me to believe that Housman would like to say I told you so but ask yourself this: Would you blame him if he did?
BMC2012
—————————————————————————————————————
A Shropshire Lad
I
From Clee to heaven the beacon burns,
The shires have seen it plain,
From north and south the sign returns
And beacons burn again.
Look left, look right, the hills are bright,
The dales are light between,
Because ’tis fifty years to-night
That God has saved the Queen.
Now, when the flame they watch not towers
About the soil they trod,
Lads, we ’ll remember friends of ours
Who shared the work with God.
To skies that knit their heartstrings right,
To fields that bred them brave,
The saviours come not home to-night
Themselves they could not save.
It dawns in Asia, tombstones show
And Shropshire names are read;
And the Nile spills his overflow
Beside the Severn’s dead.
We pledge in peace by farm and town
The Queen they served in war,
And fire the beacons up and down
The land they perished for.
‘God save the Queen’ we living sing,
From height to height ’tis heard;
And with the rest your voices ring,
Lads of the Fifty-third.
Oh, God will save her, fear you not:
Be you the men you ’ve been,
Get you the sons your fathers got,
And God will save the Queen.
AE Housman

